Components:
Method of action:
Treatment option:
Medically reviewed by Fedorchenko Olga Valeryevna, PharmD. Last updated on 20.03.2022
Attention! Information on this page is intended only for medical professionals! Information is collected in open sources and may contain significant errors! Be careful and double-check all the information on this page!
Top 20 medicines with the same components:
Treatment in combination with other antiepileptic medicinal products for patients with resistant partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalisation, that is where all other appropriate medicinal product combinations have proved inadequate or have not been tolerated.
Monotherapy in the treatment of infantile spasms (West's syndrome).
Sabril Tablets treatment may only be initiated by a specialist in epileptology, neurology or paediatric neurology. Follow-up should be arranged under supervision of a specialist in epileptology, neurology or paediatric neurology.
Posology
<2).Paediatric population
Resistant partial epilepsy
The recommended starting dose in neonates, children and adolescents is 40mg/kg/day. Maintenance recommendations in relation to bodyweight are:
| Bodyweight: | 10 to 15kg: | 0.5-1g/day |
| 15 to 30kg: | 1-1.5g/day | |
| 30 to 50kg: | 1.5-3g/day | |
| >50kg: | 2-3g/day |
The maximum recommended dose in each of these categories should not be exceeded.
Monotherapy for infantile spasms (West's Syndrome)
The recommended starting dose is 50mg/kg/day. This may be titrated over a period of one week if necessary. Doses of up to 150mg/kg/day have been used with good tolerability.
Older people and patients with renal impairment
Since vigabatrin is eliminated via the kidney, caution should be exercised when administering the drug to the older people and more particularly in patients with creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min. Adjustment of dose or frequency of administration should be considered. Such patients may respond to a lower maintenance dose. Patients should be monitored for undesirable effects such as sedation or confusion.
Sabril treatment may only be initiated by a specialist in epileptology, neurology or paediatric neurology. Follow-up should be arranged under supervision of a specialist in epileptology, neurology or paediatric neurology.
Posology
<2).Paediatric population
Resistant partial epilepsy
The recommended starting dose in neonates, children and adolescents is 40mg/kg/day. Maintenance recommendations in relation to bodyweight are:
| Bodyweight: | 10 to 15kg: | 0.5-1g/day |
| 15 to 30kg: | 1-1.5g/day | |
| 30 to 50kg: | 1.5-3g/day | |
| >50kg: | 2-3g/day |
The maximum recommended dose in each of these categories should not be exceeded.
Monotherapy for infantile spasms (West's Syndrome)
The recommended starting dose is 50mg/kg/day. This may be titrated over a period of one week if necessary. Doses of up to 150mg/kg/day have been used with good tolerability.
Older people and patients with renal impairment
Since vigabatrin is eliminated via the kidney, caution should be exercised when administering the drug to the older people and more particularly in patients with creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min. Adjustment of dose or frequency of administration should be considered. Such patients may respond to a lower maintenance dose. Patients should be monitored for undesirable effects such as sedation or confusion.
Except for the treatment of infantile spasms, Sabril Tablets should not be initiated as monotherapy.
| Visual field defects (VFD) have been reported in patients receiving vigabatrin with a high prevalence (about 1/3 of patients). The onset is usually after months to years of vigabatrin therapy. The degree of visual field restriction may be severe and this may have practical consequences for the patient. Most of the patients with perimetry-confirmed defects have been asymptomatic. Hence, this undesirable effect can only be reliably detected by systematic perimetry which is usually possible only in patients with a developmental age of more than 9 years. A specifically developed method based on field specific Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) is available from the company on request to test the presence of peripheral vision in children aged 3 years and above. At present this method has not been validated in the detection of vigabatrin attributed visual field defects. Electroretinography may be useful but should be used only in adults who are unable to cooperate with perimetry or in the very young (see Visual Field Defects). Available data suggests that visual field defects are irreversible even after discontinuation of vigabatrin. A deterioration of VFD after the treatment is discontinued cannot be excluded. Therefore, vigabatrin should only be used after a careful assessment of the balance of benefits and risk compared with alternatives. Vigabatrin is not recommended for use in patients with any pre-existing clinically significant visual field defect. Patients should undergo systematic screening examination when starting vigabatrin and at regular intervals for detection of visual field defects. Visual field testing should continue at 6 month intervals for the whole duration of treatment (see Visual Field Defects). |
Visual Field Defects (VFD)
Based on available data, the usual pattern is a concentric constriction of the visual field of both eyes, which is generally more marked nasally than temporally. In the central visual field (within 30 degree of eccentricity), frequently an annular nasal defect is seen. However, the VFDs reported in patients receiving vigabatrin have ranged from mild to severe. Severe cases are potentially disabling.
Most patients with perimetry confirmed defects had not previously spontaneously noticed any symptoms, even in cases where a severe defect was observed in perimetry. Available evidence suggests that the VFD is irreversible even after discontinuation of vigabatrin. A possible association between the risk of visual field defects and the extent of vigabatrin exposure, both in terms of daily dose (from 1 gram to more than 3 grams) and in terms of duration of treatment (maximum during the first three years) has been shown in this study.
All patients should have ophthalmological consultation with visual field examination before the initiation of vigabatrin treatment.
Appropriate visual field testing (perimetry) by using a standardised static perimetry (Humphrey or Octopus) or kinetic perimetry (Goldmann) must be performed before treatment initiation and at six-month intervals for the whole duration of treatment. Static perimetry is the preferred method for detecting vigabatrin associated visual field defect.
Electroretinography may be useful but should only be used in adults who are unable to cooperate with perimetry. Based on the available data the first oscillatory potential and 30 Hz flicker responses of the electroretinogram appear to be correlated with a vigabatrin associated VFD. These responses are delayed and reduced beyond the normal limits. Such changes have not been seen in vigabatrin treated patients without a VFD.
The patient and/or caregiver must be given a thorough description of the frequency and implications of the development of VFD during vigabatrin treatment. Patients should be instructed to report any new visual problems and symptoms which may be associated with visual field constriction. If visual symptoms develop, the patient should be referred to an ophthalmologist.
If a visual field constriction is observed during follow-up, consideration should be given to gradual discontinuation of vigabatrin. If the decision to continue treatment is made, consideration should be given to more frequent follow-up (perimetry) in order to detect progression or sight threatening defects.
Vigabatrin should not be used concomitantly with other retinotoxic drugs.
Paediatric population
Perimetry is seldom possible in children less than 9 years of developmental age. The risks of treatment must be very carefully weighed against possible benefit in children. Currently, there is no established method to diagnose or exclude visual field defects in children in whom a standardised perimetry cannot be performed. A specifically developed method based on field specific Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) is available from the company on request to test the presence of peripheral vision in children aged 3 years and above. At present this method has not been validated in the detection of vigabatrin attributed visual field defects. If the method reveals normal central visual field response but an absent peripheral response, benefit-risk of vigabatrin must be reviewed and consideration given to gradual discontinuation. The presence of peripheral vision does not exclude the possibility of developing VFD. Electroretinography may be useful but should be used only in children less than 3 years of age.
Neurological and psychiatric conditions
In view of the results of the animal safety studies , it is recommended that patients treated with vigabatrin are closely observed for adverse effects on neurological function.
Rare reports of encephalopathic symptoms such as marked sedation, stupor and confusion in association with non-specific slow wave activity on electroencephalogram have been described soon after the initiation of vigabatrin treatment. Risk factors for the development of these reactions include higher than recommended starting dose, faster dose escalation at higher steps than recommended, and renal failure. These events have been reversible following dose reduction or discontinuation of vigabatrin..
Cases of abnormal brain MRIs findings have been reported, in particular in young infants treated for infantile spasms with high doses of vigabatrin. The clinical significance of these findings is currently unknown.
Movement disorders including dystonia, dyskinesia and hypertonia, have been reported in patients treated for infantile spasms. The benefit/risk of vigabatrin should be evaluated on an individual patient basis. If new movement disorders occur during treatment with vigabatrin, consideration should be given to dose reduction or a gradual discontinuation of treatment.
As with other antiepileptic medicinal products some patients may experience an increase in seizure frequency or the onset of new types of seizures with vigabatrin. These phenomena may also be the consequence of an overdose, a decrease in plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic treatment, or a paradoxical effect.
As with other antiepileptic medicinal products, abrupt withdrawal may lead to rebound seizures. If a patient is to be withdrawn from vigabatrin treatment, it is recommended that this is done by gradual dose reduction over a 2‑ to 4‑week period.
Vigabatrin should be used with caution in patients with a history of psychosis, depression or behavioural problems. Psychiatric events (e.g., agitation, depression, abnormal thinking, paranoid reactions) have been reported during vigabatrin treatment. These events occurred in patients with and without a psychiatric history, and were usually reversible when vigabatrin doses were reduced or gradually discontinued.
Suicidal ideation and behaviour
Suicidal ideation and behaviour have been reported in patients treated with antiepileptic agents in several indications.
Therefore, patients should be monitored for signs of suicidal ideation and behaviour, and appropriate treatment should be considered. Patients (and caregivers of patients) should be advised to seek medical advice immediately should signs of suicidal ideation or behaviour emerge.
Older people and patients with renal impairment
Since vigabatrin is eliminated via the kidney, caution should be exercised in patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 60 ml/min and in older people. These patients should be monitored closely for undesirable effects such as sedation and confusion..
Except for the treatment of infantile spasms, Sabril should not be initiated as monotherapy.
| Visual field defects (VFD) have been reported in patients receiving vigabatrin with a high prevalence (about 1/3 of patients). The onset is usually after months to years of vigabatrin therapy. The degree of visual field restriction may be severe and this may have practical consequences for the patient. Most of the patients with perimetry-confirmed defects have been asymptomatic. Hence, this undesirable effect can only be reliably detected by systematic perimetry which is usually possible only in patients with a developmental age of more than 9 years. A specifically developed method based on field specific Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) is available from the company on request to test the presence of peripheral vision in children aged 3 years and above. At present this method has not been validated in the detection of vigabatrin attributed visual field defects. Electroretinography may be useful but should be used only in adults who are unable to cooperate with perimetry or in the very young (see Visual Field Defects). Available data suggests that visual field defects are irreversible even after discontinuation of vigabatrin. A deterioration of VFD after the treatment is discontinued cannot be excluded. Therefore, vigabatrin should only be used after a careful assessment of the balance of benefits and risk compared with alternatives. Vigabatrin is not recommended for use in patients with any pre-existing clinically significant visual field defect. Patients should undergo systematic screening examination when starting vigabatrin and at regular intervals for detection of visual field defects. Visual field testing should continue at 6 month intervals for the whole duration of treatment (see Visual Field Defects). |
Visual Field Defects (VFD)
Based on available data, the usual pattern is a concentric constriction of the visual field of both eyes, which is generally more marked nasally than temporally. In the central visual field (within 30 degree of eccentricity), frequently an annular nasal defect is seen. However, the VFDs reported in patients receiving vigabatrin have ranged from mild to severe. Severe cases are potentially disabling.
Most patients with perimetry confirmed defects had not previously spontaneously noticed any symptoms, even in cases where a severe defect was observed in perimetry. Available evidence suggests that the VFD is irreversible even after discontinuation of vigabatrin. A possible association between the risk of visual field defects and the extent of vigabatrin exposure, both in terms of daily dose (from 1 gram to more than 3 grams) and in terms of duration of treatment (maximum during the first three years) has been shown in this study.
All patients should have ophthalmological consultation with visual field examination before the initiation of vigabatrin treatment.
Appropriate visual field testing (perimetry) by using a standardised static perimetry (Humphrey or Octopus) or kinetic perimetry (Goldmann) must be performed before treatment initiation and at six-month intervals for the whole duration of treatment. Static perimetry is the preferred method for detecting vigabatrin associated visual field defect.
Electroretinography may be useful but should only be used in adults who are unable to cooperate with perimetry. Based on the available data the first oscillatory potential and 30 Hz flicker responses of the electroretinogram appear to be correlated with a vigabatrin associated VFD. These responses are delayed and reduced beyond the normal limits. Such changes have not been seen in vigabatrin treated patients without a VFD.
The patient and/or caregiver must be given a thorough description of the frequency and implications of the development of VFD during vigabatrin treatment. Patients should be instructed to report any new visual problems and symptoms which may be associated with visual field constriction. If visual symptoms develop, the patient should be referred to an ophthalmologist.
If a visual field constriction is observed during follow-up, consideration should be given to gradual discontinuation of vigabatrin. If the decision to continue treatment is made, consideration should be given to more frequent follow-up (perimetry) in order to detect progression or sight threatening defects.
Vigabatrin should not be used concomitantly with other retinotoxic drugs.
Paediatric population
Perimetry is seldom possible in children less than 9 years of developmental age. The risks of treatment must be very carefully weighed against possible benefit in children. Currently, there is no established method to diagnose or exclude visual field defects in children in whom a standardised perimetry cannot be performed. A specifically developed method based on field specific Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) is available from the company on request to test the presence of peripheral vision in children aged 3 years and above. At present this method has not been validated in the detection of vigabatrin attributed visual field defects. If the method reveals normal central visual field response but an absent peripheral response, benefit-risk of vigabatrin must be reviewed and consideration given to gradual discontinuation. The presence of peripheral vision does not exclude the possibility of developing VFD. Electroretinography may be useful but should be used only in children less than 3 years of age.
Neurological and psychiatric conditions
In view of the results of the animal safety studies , it is recommended that patients treated with vigabatrin are closely observed for adverse effects on neurological function.
Rare reports of encephalopathic symptoms such as marked sedation, stupor and confusion in association with non-specific slow wave activity on electroencephalogram have been described soon after the initiation of vigabatrin treatment. Risk factors for the development of these reactions include higher than recommended starting dose, faster dose escalation at higher steps than recommended, and renal failure. These events have been reversible following dose reduction or discontinuation of vigabatrin..
Cases of abnormal brain MRIs findings have been reported, in particular in young infants treated for infantile spasms with high doses of vigabatrin. The clinical significance of these findings is currently unknown.
Movement disorders including dystonia, dyskinesia and hypertonia, have been reported in patients treated for infantile spasms. The benefit/risk of vigabatrin should be evaluated on an individual patient basis. If new movement disorders occur during treatment with vigabatrin, consideration should be given to dose reduction or a gradual discontinuation of treatment.
As with other antiepileptic medicinal products some patients may experience an increase in seizure frequency or the onset of new types of seizures with vigabatrin. These phenomena may also be the consequence of an overdose, a decrease in plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic treatment, or a paradoxical effect.
As with other antiepileptic medicinal products, abrupt withdrawal may lead to rebound seizures. If a patient is to be withdrawn from vigabatrin treatment, it is recommended that this is done by gradual dose reduction over a 2‑ to 4‑week period.
Vigabatrin should be used with caution in patients with a history of psychosis, depression or behavioural problems. Psychiatric events (e.g., agitation, depression, abnormal thinking, paranoid reactions) have been reported during vigabatrin treatment. These events occurred in patients with and without a psychiatric history, and were usually reversible when vigabatrin doses were reduced or gradually discontinued.
Suicidal ideation and behaviour
Suicidal ideation and behaviour have been reported in patients treated with antiepileptic agents in several indications.
Therefore, patients should be monitored for signs of suicidal ideation and behaviour, and appropriate treatment should be considered. Patients (and caregivers of patients) should be advised to seek medical advice immediately should signs of suicidal ideation or behaviour emerge.
Older people and patients with renal impairment
Since vigabatrin is eliminated via the kidney, caution should be exercised in patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 60 ml/min and in older people. These patients should be monitored closely for undesirable effects such as sedation and confusion..
Summary of the safety profile
Visual field defects ranging from mild to severe have been reported frequently in patients receiving vigabatrin.).
Approximately 50% of patients in controlled clinical studies have experienced undesirable effects during vigabatrin treatment. In adults, these were mostly central nervous system related such as sedation, drowsiness, fatigue and impaired concentration. However, in children excitation or agitation is frequent. The incidence of these undesirable effects is generally higher at the beginning of treatment and decreases with time.
As with other antiepileptic drugs, some patients may experience an increase in seizure frequency, including status epilepticus with vigabatrin. Patients with myoclonic seizures may be particularly liable to this effect. New onset myoclonus and exacerbation of existing myoclonus may occur in rare cases.
Tabulated list of adverse reactions
Undesirable effects ranked under headings of frequency are listed below, using the following convention:
Very common (>1/10); common (>1/100 to <1/10); uncommon (>1/1,000 to <1/100); rare (>1/10,000 to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000); not known (cannot be estimated from the available data).
| Very common | Common | Uncommon | Rare | Very rare | Not known | |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | anaemia | |||||
| Psychiatric disorders* | agitation, aggression, nervousness, depression, paranoid reaction | hypomania, mania, psychotic disorder | suicide attempt | hallucination | ||
| Nervous system disorders | somnolence | speech disorder, headache, dizziness, paraesthesia, disturbance in attention and memory impairment, mental impairment (thought disturbance), tremor | coordination abnormal (ataxia) | encephalopathy** | optic neuritis | Cases of brain MRI abnormalities have been reported. Movement disorder, including dystonia, dyskinesia and hypertonia have been reported, either alone or in association with abnormalities in MRI. |
| Eye disorders | visual field defect | vision blurred, diplopia, nystagmus | retinal disorder (such as peripheral retinal atrophy) | optic atrophy | ||
| Gastrointestinal disorders | nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain | |||||
| Hepato-biliary disorders | hepatitis | |||||
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | rash | angioedema, urticaria | ||||
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | arthralgia | |||||
| General Disorders and administration site conditions | fatigue | oedema, irritability | ||||
| Investigations*** | weight increased |
*Psychiatric reactions have been reported during vigabatrin therapy. These reactions occurred in patients with and without a psychiatric history and were usually reversible when vigabatrin doses were reduced or gradually discontinued. Depression was a common psychiatric reaction in clinical trials but seldom required discontinuation of vigabatrin.
**Rare reports of encephalopathic symptoms such as marked sedation, stupor and confusion in association with non-specific slow wave activity on electroencephalogram have been described soon after the initiation of vigabatrin treatment. Such reactions have been fully reversible following dose reduction or discontinuation of vigabatrin.
***Laboratory data indicate that vigabatrin treatment does not lead to renal toxicity. Decreases in ALT and AST, which are considered to be a result of inhibition of these aminotransferases by vigabatrin, have been observed. Chronic treatment with vigabatrin may be associated with a slight decrease in haemoglobin which rarely attains clinical significance.
Paediatric population
Psychiatric disorders
Very common: excitation, agitation
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via Yellow Card Scheme at: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard
Symptoms
Vigabatrin overdose has been reported. When provided, doses most commonly were between 7.5 to 30g; however, ingestions up to 90g have been reported. Nearly half of the cases involved multiple drug ingestions. When reported, the most common symptoms included drowsiness or coma. Other less frequently reported symptoms included vertigo, headache, psychosis, respiratory depression or apnea, bradycardia, hypotension, agitation, irritability, confusion, abnormal behaviour, and speech disorder. None of the overdoses resulted in death.
Management
There is no specific antidote. The usual supportive measures should be employed. Measures to remove unabsorbed drug should be considered. Activated charcoal has been shown to not significantly adsorb vigabatrin in an in vitro study. The effectiveness of hemodialysis in the treatment of vigabatrin overdose is unknown. In isolated case reports in renal failure patients receiving therapeutic doses of vigabatrin, hemodialysis reduced vigabatrin plasma concentrations by 40% to 60%.
Pharmaco-therapeutic group: Antiepileptics, ATC code: N03AG04
Mechanism of action
Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic medicinal product with a clearly defined mechanism of action. Treatment with vigabatrin leads to an increase in the concentration of GABA (gamma aminobutyric acid), the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. This is because vigabatrin was designed rationally as a selective irreversible inhibitor of GABAtransaminase, the enzyme responsible for the breakdown of GABA.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Controlled and longterm clinical trials have shown that vigabatrin is an effective anticonvulsant agent when given as addon therapy in patients with epilepsy not controlled satisfactorily by conventional therapy. This efficacy is particularly marked in patients with seizures of partial origin.
Epidemiology of VFD in patients with refractory partial epilepsy was observed in an observational, open-label, multicentre, comparative, parallel group, Phase IV study, including 734 patients, at least 8 years old, with refractory partial epilepsy for at least one year.
Patients were split in three treatment groups: patients currently treated with vigabatrin (group I), patients previously exposed to vigabatrin (group II) and patients never exposed to vigabatrin (group III). The following table presents the main findings at inclusion and the first and last conclusive evaluations in the evaluable population (n=524):
| Children (from 8 to 12 years old) | Adults (>12 years old) | |||||
| Group I 1 | Group II 2 | Group III | Group I 3 | Group II 4 | Group III | |
| N=38 | N=47 | N=41 | N=150 | N=151 | N=97 | |
| Visual field defect with non-identified aetiology: | ||||||
| - Observed at inclusion | 1 (4.4%) | 3 (8.8%) | 2 (7.1%) | 31 (34.1%) | 20 (19.2%) | 1 (1.4%) |
| - Observed at first conclusive evaluation | 4 (10.5%) | 6 (12.8%) | 2 (4.9%) | 59 (39.3%) | 39 (25.8%) | 4 (4.1%) |
| - Observed at last conclusive evaluation | 10 (26.3%) | 7 (14.9%) | 3 (7.3%) | 70 (46.7%) | 47 (31.1%) | 5 (5.2%) |
1 Median treatment duration: 44.4 months, mean daily dose 1.48 g
2 Median treatment duration: 20.6 months, mean daily dose 1.39 g
3 Median treatment duration: 48.8 months, mean daily dose 2.10 g
4 Median treatment duration: 23.0 months, mean daily dose 2.18 g
Absorption
Vigabatrin is a water soluble compound and it is rapidly and completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Food administration does not alter the extent of vigabatrin absorption. Time to reach maximum plasma concentrations (tmax) is approximately 1 hour.
Distribution
Vigabatrin is widely distributed with an apparent volume of distribution slightly greater than total body water. Binding to plasma proteins is negligible.Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations are linearly related to dose over the recommended dose range.
Biotransformation
Vigabatrin is not significantly metabolised. No metabolites have been identified in plasma.
Elimination
Vigabatrin is eliminated via renal excretion with a terminal half-life of 5-8. Oral clearance (CI/F) of vigabatrin is approximately 7 L/h (i.e. 0.10 L/h.kg). Approximately 70% of a single oral dose was recovered as unchanged drug in the urine in the first 24 hours post-dose.
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics relationships
There is no direct correlation between plasma concentration and efficacy. The duration of the effect of the drug is dependent on the GABA transaminase re-synthesis rate.
Paediatric population
Pharmacokinetic properties of vigabatrin have been investigated in groups of six neonates (age 15-26 days), six infants (age 5-22 months) and six children (age 4.6-14.2 years) with refractory epilepsy. After administration of a single 37-50 mg/kg dose of an oral solution vigabatrin tmax was approximately 2.5 hours in neonates and infants, and 1 hour in children. Mean terminal half-life of vigabatrin was about 7.5 hours in neonates, 5.7 hours in infants and 5.5 hours in children. The mean Cl/F of active S-enantiomer of vigabatrin in infants and children was 0.591 L/h/kg and 0.446 L/h/kg, respectively.
Animal safety studies carried out in the rat, mouse, dog and monkey have indicated that vigabatrin has no significant adverse effects on the liver, kidney, lung, heart or gastrointestinal tract.
In the brain, microvacuolation has been observed in white matter tracts of rat, mouse and dog at doses of 30-50mg/kg/day. In the monkey these lesions are minimal or equivocal. This effect is caused by a separation of the outer lamellar sheath of myelinated fibres, a change characteristic of intramyelinic oedema. In both rat and dog the intramyelinic oedema was reversible on stopping vigabatrin treatment and even with continued treatment histologic regression was observed. However, in rodents, minor residual changes consisting of swollen axons (eosinophilic spheroids) and mineralised microbodies have been observed. In the dog, the results of an electrophysiological study indicate that intramyelinic oedema is associated with an increase in the latency of the somatosensory evoked potential which is reversible when the medicinal product is withdrawn.
Vigabatrin-associated retinotoxicity has only been observed in albino rats, but not in pigmented rats, dogs or monkeys. The retinal changes in albino rats were characterised as focal or multifocal disorganisation of the outer nuclear layer with displacement of nuclei into the rod and cone area. The other layers of retina were not affected. These lesions were observed in 80- 100% of animals at the dose of 300mg/kg/day orally. The histologic appearance of these lesions was similar to that found in albino rats following excessive exposure to light. However, the retinal changes may also represent a direct drug-induced effect.
Animal experiments have shown that vigabatrin has no negative influence on fertility or pup development. No teratogenicity was seen in rats in doses up to 150mg/kg (3 times the human dose) or in rabbits in doses up to 100 mg/kg. However, in rabbits, a slight increase in the incidence of cleft palate at doses of 150-200 mg/kg was seen.
Studies with vigabatrin revealed no evidence of mutagenic or carcinogenic effects.
Not applicable
No special requirements
