Research evidence / Overview of studies for Галотан
Evidence for the Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia
Clinical study has explored the use of Halothane (Галотан) in surgery, encompassing early clinical trials, large-scale observational studies, and later Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compare it to newer anesthetic agents. Research examined how Halothane was studied for achieving the necessary state of unconsciousness (narcosis) and maintaining the state of narcosis required for a procedure. Studies monitored physiological outcomes such as heart rate and blood pressure, as well as the need for additional pain-blocking medications. Findings describe patterns observed in the studies related to the time it takes for anesthesia to begin and the required concentration. Historically, the evidence base includes large studies designed to observe trends and associations among different anesthetic agents, adding to the historical evidence base. These findings help contextualize how the drug was studied and how patients reported their experience immediately after surgery.
Studies in Special Populations, Including Pediatric Patients
Halothane was evaluated in various patient populations, including adults undergoing major surgery. Research has also specifically explored its use in children (pediatric patients). These studies monitored outcomes related to the ease of induction—the process of falling asleep—due to its characteristics observed during the induction of narcosis. Studies focused on episodes where symptoms become more noticeable, such as during the start of anesthesia in children, where studies observed patterns related to physiological responses. While the research describes the drug's short-term characteristics across different age groups, data for certain other groups remain insufficient. Results primarily apply only to the populations studied and provide limited insight into a full range of specific clinical scenarios.
Long-Term Follow-up and Extended Data
The primary research focus for Halothane was on outcomes that occur during the procedure and in the immediate postoperative period (the first hours to a day). The largest historical observational studies did monitor patients for longer periods (days or weeks) to observe broad patterns in systemic or functional imbalance following surgery. However, long-term effects are not fully established by controlled research. Follow-up durations were limited in most of the comparative trials. Research has explored short-term symptom changes but provides limited information for long-term outcomes, such as neurocognitive function or the durability of the initial therapeutic effect years later. Therefore, outcomes reflecting daily functioning or activity level months after exposure are not well characterized in the existing clinical evidence.
Evidence Quality, Limitations, and Research Gaps
The available evidence quality varies across studies. A significant portion of the primary data is older, meaning that the methodology and comprehensive outcome reporting may not meet the standards of modern RCTs. Furthermore, much of the more recent, high-quality research on Halothane is focused on comparing it to newer agents rather than re-establishing its own primary characteristics. Historical observational studies describe associations but are not based on randomized control. Consequently, data for certain groups remain insufficient, and research is still ongoing, particularly regarding longer-term outcomes. The findings describe group patterns, and research provides context, but it does not determine whether an individual will respond similarly.
Key Studies & References
- A comparison between the effect of halothane and propofol on liver enzymes after general anesthesia
- Halothane - eEML - Electronic Essential Medicines List (WHO)