Халавен

Халавен is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have progressed after at least one chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced disease. Prior therapy should have included an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting unless patients were not suitable for these treatments.

Халавен is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable liposarcoma who have received prior anthracycline containing therapy (unless unsuitable) for advanced or metastatic disease.

Халавен should only be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in the appropriate use of cytotoxic medicinal products.

Posology

The recommended dose of eribulin as the ready to use solution is 1.23 mg/m² which should be administered intravenously over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every 21-day cycle.

Please note:

In the EU the recommended dose refers to the base of the active substance (eribulin). Calculation of the individual dose to be administered to a patient must be based on the strength of the ready to use solution that contains 0.44 mg/ml eribulin and the dose recommendation of 1.23 mg/m². The dose reduction recommendations shown below are also shown as the dose of eribulin to be administered based on the strength of the ready to use solution.

In the pivotal trials, the corresponding publications and in some other regions e.g. the United States and Switzerland, the recommended dose is based on the salt form (eribulin mesilate).

Patients may experience nausea or vomiting. Antiemetic prophylaxis including corticosteroids should be considered.

Dose delays during therapy

The administration of Халавен should be delayed on Day 1 or Day 8 for any of the following:

- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1 x 10⁹/l

- Platelets < 75 x 10⁹/l

- Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities.

Dose reduction during therapy

Dose reduction recommendations for retreatment are shown in the following table.

Dose reduction recommendations

The dose of eribulin should not be re-escalated after it has been reduced.

Patients with hepatic impairment

Impaired liver function due to metastases

The recommended dose of eribulin in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A) is 0.97 mg/m² administered intravenously over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The recommended dose of eribulin in patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B) is 0.62 mg/m² administered intravenously over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) has not been studied but it is expected that a more marked dose reduction is needed if eribulin is used in these patients.

Impaired liver function due to cirrhosis

This patient group has not been studied. The doses above may be used in mild and moderate impairment but close monitoring is advised as the doses may need readjustment.

Patients with renal impairment

Some patients with moderately or severely impaired renal function (creatinine clearance <50 ml/min) may have increased eribulin exposure and may need a reduction of the dose. For all patients with renal impairment, caution and close safety monitoring is advised.

Elderly patients

No specific dose adjustments are recommended based on the age of the patient.

Paediatric population

There is no relevant use of Халавен in children and adolescents for the indication of breast cancer.

The safety and efficacy of Халавен in children from birth to 18 years of age have not yet been established in soft tissue sarcoma. No data are available.

Method of administration

Халавен is for intravenous use.

-

- Breast-feeding

Haematology

). Monitoring of complete blood counts should be performed on all patients prior to each dose of eribulin. Treatment with eribulin should only be initiated in patients with ANC values > 1.5 x 10⁹/l and platelets > 100 x 10⁹/l.

Febrile neutropenia occurred in < 5% of patients treated with eribulin.

Patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) experienced a higher incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Although data are limited, patients with bilirubin >1.5 x ULN also have a higher incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia.

Fatal cases of febrile neutropenia, neutropenic sepsis, sepsis and septic shock have been reported.

Severe neutropenia may be managed by the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or equivalent at the physician's discretion in accordance with relevant guidelines.

Peripheral neuropathy

Patients should be closely monitored for signs of peripheral motor and sensory neuropathy. The development of severe peripheral neurotoxicity requires a delay or reduction of dose

In clinical trials, patients with pre-existing neuropathy greater than Grade 2 were excluded. However, patients with pre-existing neuropathy Grade 1 or 2 were no more likely to develop new or worsening symptoms than those who entered the study without the condition.

QT prolongation

In an uncontrolled open-label ECG study in 26 patients, QT prolongation was observed on Day 8, independent of eribulin concentration, with no QT prolongation observed on Day 1. ECG monitoring is recommended if therapy is initiated in patients with congestive heart failure, bradyarrhythmias or concomittant treatment with medicinal products known to prolong the QT interval, including Class Ia and III antiarrhythmics, and electrolyte abnormalities. Hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia should be corrected prior to initiating Халавен and these electrolytes should be monitored periodically during therapy. Eribulin should be avoided in patients with congenital long QT syndrome.

Excipients

This medicinal product contains small amounts of ethanol (alcohol), less than 100 mg per dose.

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain

Халавен may cause adverse reactions such as tiredness and dizziness which may lead to minor or moderate influence on the ability to drive or use machines. Patients should be advised not to drive or use machines if they feel tired or dizzy.

Summary of safety profile

The most commonly reported adverse reactions related to Халавен, are bone marrow suppression manifested as neutropenia, leucopenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia with associated infections. New onset or worsening of pre-existing peripheral neuropathy has also been reported. Gastrointestinal toxicities, manifested as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, and stomatitis are among reported undesirable effects. Other undesirable effects include fatigue, alopecia, increased liver enzymes, sepsis and musculoskeletal pain syndrome.

Tabulated list of adverse reactions

Unless otherwise noted, the table shows the incidence rates of adverse reactions observed in breast cancer and soft tissue sarcoma patients who received the recommended dose in Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies.

Frequency categories are defined as: very common (> 1/10), common (> 1/100 to < 1/10), uncommon (> 1/1,000 to < 1/100), rare (> 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000) and very rare (< 1/10,000).

Within each frequency grouping, undesirable effects are presented in order of decreasing frequency. Where Grade 3 or 4 reactions occurred, the actual total frequency and the frequency of Grade 3 or 4 reactions are given.

^a Includes Grade 5 events.

^b From spontaneous reporting

^c Includes preferred terms of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral motor neuropathy, polyneuropathy, paraesthesia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy and demyelinating polyneuropathy

^d No Grade 4 events

^* Rare

^** Frequency not known

Overall, the safety profiles in the breast cancer and soft tissue sarcoma patient populations were similar.

Description of selected adverse reactions

Neutropenia

The neutropenia observed was reversible and not cumulative; the mean time to nadir was 13 days and the mean time to recovery from severe neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10⁹/l) was 8 days.

Neutrophil counts of < 0.5 x 10⁹/l that lasted for more than 7 days occurred in 13% of breast cancer patients treated with eribulin in the EMBRACE study.

Neutropenia was reported as a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) in 151/404 (37.4% for all grades) in the sarcoma population, compared with 902/1559 (57.9% for all grades) in the breast cancer population. The combined grouped TEAE and neutrophil laboratory abnormality frequencies were 307/404 (76.0%) and 1314/1559 (84.3%), respectively. The median duration of treatment was 12.0 weeks for sarcoma patients and 15.9 weeks for breast cancer patients.

Fatal cases of febrile neutropenia, neutropenic sepsis, sepsis and septic shock have been reported. Out of 1963 breast cancer and soft tissue sarcoma patients who received eribulin at the recommended dose in clinical trials there was one fatal event each of neutropenic sepsis (0.1%) and febrile neutropenia (0.1%). In addition there were 3 fatal events of sepsis (0.2%) and one of septic shock (0.1%).

Severe neutropenia may be managed by the use of G-CSF or equivalent at the physician's discretion in accordance with relevant guidelines. 18% and 13% of eribulin treated patients received G-CSF in the two phase 3 breast cancer studies (Studies 305 and 301, respectively). In the phase 3 sarcoma study (Study 309), 26% of the eribulin treated patients received G-CSF.

Neutropenia resulted in discontinuation in < 1% of patients receiving eribulin.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation have been reported, typically in association with neutropenia and/or sepsis.

Peripheral neuropathy

In the 1559 breast cancer patients the most common adverse reaction resulting in discontinuation of treatment with eribulin was peripheral neuropathy (3.4%). The median time to Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy was 12.6 weeks (post 4 cycles). Out of the 404 sarcoma patients, 2 patients discontinued treatment with eribulin due to peripheral neuropathy. The median time to Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy was 18.4 weeks.

Development of Grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 7.4% of breast cancer patients and 3.5% of sarcoma patients. In clinical trials, patients with pre-existing neuropathy were as likely to develop new or worsening symptoms as those who entered the study without the condition.

In breast cancer patients with pre-existing Grade 1 or 2 peripheral neuropathy the frequency of treatment-emergent Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was 14%.

Hepatotoxicity

In some patients with normal/abnormal liver enzymes prior treatment with eribulin, increased levels of liver enzymes have been reported with initiation of eribulin treatment. Such elevations appeared to have occurred early with eribulin treatment in cycle 1 - 2 for the majority of these patients and whilst thought likely to be a phenomenon of adaptation to eribulin treatment by the liver and not a sign of significant liver toxicity in most patients, hepatotoxicity has also been reported.

Special populations

Elderly population

Of the 1559 breast cancer patients treated with the recommended dose of eribulin, 283 patients (18.2%) were > 65 years of age. In the 404 sarcoma patient population, 90 patients (22.3%) treated with eribulin were > 65 years of age. The safety profile of eribulin in elderly patients (> 65 years of age) was similar to that of patients <65 years of age except for asthenia/fatigue which showed an increasing trend with age. No dose adjustments are recommended for the elderly population.

Patients with hepatic impairment

Patients with ALT or AST > 3 x ULN experienced a higher incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia.2).

Reporting of suspected adverse reactions

Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard

In one case of overdose the patient inadvertently received 7.6 mg of eribulin (approximately 4 times the planned dose) and subsequently developed a hypersensitivity reaction (Grade 3) on Day 3 and neutropenia (Grade 3) on Day 7. Both adverse reactions resolved with supportive care.

There is no known antidote for eribulin overdose. In the event of an overdose, the patient should be closely monitored. Management of overdose should include supportive medical interventions to treat the presenting clinical manifestations.

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other antineoplastic agents, ATC code: L01XX41

Eribulin mesilate is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor belonging to the halichondrin class of antineoplastic agents. It is a structurally simplified synthetic analogue of halichondrin B, a natural product isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria okadai.

Eribulin inhibits the growth phase of microtubules without affecting the shortening phase and sequesters tubulin into non-productive aggregates. Eribulin exerts its effects via a tubulin-based antimitotic mechanism leading to G₂/M cell-cycle block, disruption of mitotic spindles, and, ultimately, apoptotic cell death after prolonged and irreversible mitotic blockage.

Clinical efficacy

Breast cancer

The efficacy of Халавен in breast cancer is primarily supported by two randomized Phase 3 comparative studies.

The 762 patients in the pivotal Phase 3 EMBRACE study (Study 305) had locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, and had previously received at least two and a maximum of five chemotherapy regimens, including an anthracycline and a taxane (unless contraindicated). Patients must have progressed within 6 months of their last chemotherapeutic regimen. The HER2 status of the patients was: 16.1% positive, 74.2% negative and 9.7% unknown, whilst 18.9% of patients were triple negative. They were randomized 2:1 to receive either Халавен, or treatment of physician's choice (TPC), which consisted of 97% chemotherapy (26% vinorelbine, 18% gemcitabine, 18% capecitabine, 16% taxane, 9% anthracycline, 10% other chemotherapy), or 3% hormonal therapy.

The study met its primary endpoint with an overall survival (OS) result that was statistically significantly better in the eribulin group compared to TPC at 55% of events.

This result was confirmed with an updated overall survival analysis carried out at 77% of events.

Study 305 - Updated Overall Survival ( ITT Population)

By independent review, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months for eribulin compared to 2.2 months for the TPC arm (HR 0.865, 95% CI: 0.714, 1.048, p=0.137). In response evaluable patients, the objective response rate by the RECIST criteria was 12.2% (95% CI: 9.4%, 15.5%) by independent review for the eribulin arm compared to 4.7% (95% CI: 2.3%, 8.4%) for the TPC arm.

The positive effect on OS was seen in both taxane-refractory and non-refractory groups of patients. In the OS update, the HR for eribulin versus TPC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.14) in favour of eribulin for taxane-refractory patients and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.96) for patients not taxane-refractory.

The positive effect on OS was seen both in capecitabine-naïve and in capecitabine pre-treated patient groups. The updated OS analysis showed a survival benefit for the eribulin group compared to TPC both in capecitabine pre-treated patients with a HR of 0.787 (95% CI: 0.645, 0.961), and for the capecitabine-naïve patients with a corresponding HR of 0.865 (95% CI: 0.606, 1.233).

The second Phase 3 study in earlier line metastatic breast cancer, Study 301, was an open-label, randomized, study in patients (n=1102) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer to investigate the efficacy of Халавен monotherapy compared to capecitabine monotherapy in terms of OS and PFS as co-primary endpoint. Patients had previously received up to three prior chemotherapy regimens, including both an anthracycline and a taxane and a maximum of two for advanced disease, with the percentage who had received 0, 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy treatments for metastatic breast cancer being 20.0%, 52.0% or 27.2% respectively. The HER2 status of the patients was: 15.3% positive, 68.5% negative and 16.2% unknown, whilst 25.8% of patients were triple negative.

Study 301 - Overall Survival (ITT Population)

Progression free survival assessed by independent review was similar between eribulin and capecitabine with medians of 4.1 months vs 4.2 months (HR 1.08; [95% CI: 0.932, 1.250]) respectively. Objective response rate as assessed by independent review was also similar between eribulin and capecitabine; 11.0% (95% CI: 8.5, 13.9) in the eribulin group and 11.5% (95% CI: 8.9, 14.5) in the capecitabine group.

The overall survival in patients in HER2 negative and HER2 positive patients in the eribulin and control groups in Study 305 and Study 301 is shown below:

Liposarcoma

In liposarcoma the efficacy of eribulin is supported by the pivotal Phase 3 sarcoma study (Study 309). The patients in this study (n=452) had locally recurrent, inoperable and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of one of two subtypes - leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma. Patients had received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens, one of which must have been an anthracycline (unless contraindicated).

Patients must have progressed within 6 months of their last chemotherapeutic regimen. They were randomized 1:1 to receive either eribulin 1.23 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle or dacarbazine 850 mg/m², 1000 mg/m² or 1200 mg/m² (dose determined by the investigator prior to randomization), every 21 days.

In Study 309, a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed in patients randomized to the eribulin arm compared to the control arm. This translated into a 2 month improvement in median OS (13.5 months for eribulin treated patients vs. 11.5 months for dacarbazine treated patients). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival or overall response rate between the treatment arms in the overall population.

Treatment effects of eribulin were limited to patients with liposarcoma (45% dedifferentiated, 37% myxoid/round cell and 18% pleomorphic in Study 309) based on pre-planned subgroup analyses of OS and PFS. There was no difference in efficacy between eribulin and dacarbazine in patients with advanced or metastatic leiomyosarcoma.

Study 309 - Overall Survival in the Liposarcoma Subgroup

Study 309 - Progression Free Survival in the Liposarcoma Subgroup

Paediatric population

).

The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Халавен in one or more subsets of the paediatric population for the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma and non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma.

Distribution

The pharmacokinetics of eribulin are characterized by a rapid distribution phase followed by a prolonged elimination phase, with a mean terminal half-life of approximately 40 h. It has a large volume of distribution (range of means 43 to 114 l/m²).

Eribulin is weakly bound to plasma proteins. The plasma protein binding of eribulin (100-1000 ng/ml) ranged from 49% to 65% in human plasma.

Biotransformation

Unchanged eribulin was the major circulating species in plasma following administration of ¹⁴C-eribulin to patients. Metabolite concentrations represented <0.6% of parent compound, confirming that there are no major human metabolites of eribulin.

Elimination

Eribulin has a low clearance (range of means 1.16 to 2.42 l/h/m²). No significant accumulation of eribulin is observed on weekly administration. The pharmacokinetic properties are not dose or time dependent in the range of eribulin doses of 0.22 to 3.53 mg/m².

Eribulin is eliminated primarily by biliary excretion. The transport protein involved in the excretion is presently unknown. Preclinical in vitro studies indicate that eribulin is transported by Pgp. However it has been shown that at clinically relevant concentrations eribulin is not a Pgp inhibitor in vitro. Additionally, in vivo, concomitant administration of ketoconazole, a Pgp inhibitor, has no effect on eribulin exposure (AUC and C_max). In vitro studies have also indicated that eribulin is not a substrate for OCT1.

After administration of ¹⁴C-eribulin to patients, approximately 82% of the dose was eliminated in faeces and 9% in urine indicating that renal clearance is not a significant route of eribulin elimination.

Unchanged eribulin represented most of the total radioactivity in faeces and urine.

Hepatic impairment

A study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of eribulin in patients with mild (Child-Pugh A; n=7) and moderate (Child-Pugh B; n=4) hepatic impairment due to liver metastases.

Renal impairment

Increased eribulin exposure was seen in some patients with moderately or severely impaired renal function, with high between-subject variability.

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain

Халавен is a cytotoxic anticancer medicinal product and, as with other toxic compounds, caution should be exercised in its handling. The use of gloves, goggles, and protective clothing is recommended. If the skin comes into contact with the solution it should be washed immediately and thoroughly with soap and water. If it contacts mucous membranes, the membranes should be flushed thoroughly with water. Халавен should only be prepared and administered by personnel appropriately trained in handling of cytotoxic agents. Pregnant staff should not handle Халавен.

Using aseptic technique Халавен can be diluted up to 100 ml with sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%) solution for injection. Following administration, it is recommended that the intravenous line be flushed with sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%) solution for injection to ensure administration of the complete dose. It must not be mixed with other medicinal products and should not be diluted in glucose 5% infusion solution.

Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain

• R52.1 – Chronic intractable pain
• R52.2 – Other chronic pain
• R52.9 – Unspecified pain