Medically reviewed by Fedorchenko Olga Valeryevna, PharmD. Last updated on 2020-04-01
Attention! Information on this page is intended only for medical professionals! Information is collected in open sources and may contain significant errors! Be careful and double-check all the information on this page!
Top 20 medicines with the same components:
Lanoxin MD is indicated in the management of chronic cardiac failure where the dominant problem is systolic dysfunction. The therapeutic benefit of Lanoxin MD is greater in patients with ventricular dilatation.
Lanoxin MD is specifically indicated where cardiac failure is accompanied by atrial fibrillation.
Lanoxin MD is indicated in the management of certain supraventricular arrhythmias, particularly chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter, where its major beneficial effect is to reduce the ventricular rate.
Lanoxin MD injection is indicated when emergency parenteral digitilisation is required in patients who have not been given cardiac glycosides within the preceding two weeks.
Lanoxin MD Injection is for administration by slow intravenous infusion (see Method of administration below).
The dose of Lanoxin MD for each patient has to be tailored individually according to age, lean body weight and renal function. Suggested doses are intended only as an initial guide.
If cases where cardiac glycosides have been taken in the preceding two weeks, the recommendations for initial dosing of a patient should be reconsidered and a reduced dose is advised.
The difference in bioavailability between injectable Lanoxin MD and oral formulations must be considered when changing from one dosage form to another. For example if patients are switched from oral to the I.V. formulation the dosage should be reduced by approximately 33%.
Emergency parenteral digitalisation (in patients who have not been given cardiac glycosides within the preceding two weeks):
Adults and paediatric populations over 10 years
Parenteral loading should only be used in patients who have not been given cardiac glycosides within the preceding two weeks.
The total loading dose of parenteral Lanoxin MD is 500 to 1000 micrograms (0.5 to 1.0 mg) depending on age, lean body weight and renal function. The total loading dose should be administered in divided doses with approximately half of the total dose given as the first dose and further fractions of the total dose given at intervals of 4 - 8 hours. An assessment of clinical response should be performed before giving each additional dose.
Each dose should be given by intravenous infusion (see Method of administration) over a period of 10 - 20 minutes.
- Maintenance Dose:
The maintenance dosage should be based upon the percentage of the peak body stores lost each day through elimination. The following formula has had wide clinical use:
Ccr is creatinine clearance corrected to 70 kg body weight or 1.73 m2 body surface area.
If only serum creatinine (Scr) concentrations are available, a Ccr (corrected to 70 kg body weight) may be estimated in men as
NOTE: Where serum creatinine values are obtained in micromol/L these may be converted to mg/100 ml (mg %) as follows:
Where 113.12 is the molecular weight of creatinine.
For women, this result should be multiplied by 0.85.
NOTE: These formulae cannot be used for creatinine clearance in children.
In practice, this will mean that most patients with heart failure will be maintained on 125 to 250 micrograms (0.125 to 0.25 mg) Lanoxin MD daily; however in those who show increased sensitivity to the adverse effects of Lanoxin MD, a dosage of 62.5 microgram (0.0625 mg) daily or less may suffice. Conversely, some patients may require a higher dose.
Neonates, infants & paediatric populations up to 10 years of age:
if cardiac glycosides have been given in the two weeks preceding commencement of Lanoxin MD therapy, it should be anticipated that optimum loading doses of Lanoxin MD will be less than those recommended below.
In the newborn, particularly in the premature infant, renal clearance of Lanoxin MD is diminished and suitable dose reductions must be observed, over and above general dosage instructions.
Beyond the immediate newborn period, children generally require proportionally larger doses than adults on the basis of body weight or body surface area, as indicated in the schedule below. Children over 10 years of age require adult dosages in proportion to their body weight.
Parenteral Loading dose:
The I.V. loading dose in the above groups should be administered in accordance with the following schedule:
Pre- term neonates
Less than 1.5kg
20 micrograms/kg over 24 hours
1.5 - 2.5kg
30 micrograms/kg over 24 hours
To age 2 years
35 micrograms/kg over 24 hours
Age 2 - 5 years
35 micrograms/kg over 24 hours
Age 5 - 10 years
25 micrograms/kg over 24 hours
The loading dose should be administered in divided doses with approximately half the total dose given as the first dose and further fractions of the total dose given at intervals of 4 - 8 hours, assessing the clinical response before giving each additional dose. Each dose should be given by intravenous infusion (see Method of Administration) over a period of 10 - 20 minutes.
The maintenance dose should be administered in accordance with the following schedule:
daily dose = 20% of 24-hour loading dose (intravenous or oral)
Term neonates and children up to 10 years:
daily dose = 25% of 24-hour loading dose (intravenous or oral)
These dosage schedules are meant as guidelines and careful clinical observation and monitoring of serum Lanoxin MD levels should be used as a basis for adjustment of dosage in these paediatric patient groups.
The possibility of reduced renal function and lower lean body mass should be taken into account when dealing with elderly patients. If necessary, the dosage should be reduced and adjusted to the changed pharmacokinetics to prevent elevated serum Lanoxin MD levels and the risk of toxicity. The serum Lanoxin MD levels should be checked regularly and hypokalaemia should be avoided.
The dosage recommendations should be reconsidered if patients are elderly or if there are other reasons for the renal clearance of Lanoxin MD being reduced. A reduction in both initial and maintenance doses should be considered.
Method of administration:
Dilution of Lanoxin MD injection:
Lanoxin MD injection can be administered undiluted or diluted with a 4-fold or greater volume of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, 0.18 % Sodium Chloride/4% Glucose Injection or 5% Glucose Injection. A 4-fold volume of diluent equates to adding one 2 ml ampoule of Lanoxin MD to 6 ml of injection solution. The use of less than a 4-fold volume of diluent could lead to precipitation of Lanoxin MD.
Lanoxin MD Injection may be diluted with the following solutions:
Sodium Chloride Intravenous Infusion BP 0.9% w/v
Glucose Intravenous Infusion BP 5.0% w/v
Sodium Chloride (0.18% w/v) and Glucose (4% w/v) Intravenous Infusion BP
When diluted in the ratio of 1 to 250 (i.e. one 2ml ampoule containing 500 micrograms Lanoxin MD added to 500ml of infusion solution), Lanoxin MD Injection B.P. is known to be compatible with the above mentioned infusion solutions and stable for up to 48 hours at room temperature (20 - 25°C).
Dilution should be carried out either under full aseptic conditions or immediately prior to use. Any unused solution should be discarded.
Administration of Lanoxin MD injection:
Each dose should be given by intravenous infusion over of 10 - 20 minutes.
The total loading dose should be administered in divided doses with approximately half of the total dose given as the first dose and further fractions of the total dose given at intervals of 4 - 8 hours. An assessment of clinical response should be performed before giving each additional dose.
The intramuscular route is painful and is associated with muscle necrosis. This route cannot be recommended.
Rapid intravenous injection can cause vasoconstriction producing hypertension and/or reduced coronary flow. A slow injection rate is therefore important in hypertensive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction.
Lanoxin MD is contraindicated in
- intermittent complete heart block or second degree atrioventricular block, especially if there is a history of Stokes-Adams attacks.
- arrhythmias caused by cardiac glycoside intoxication.
- supraventricular arrhythmias associated with an accessory atrioventricular pathway, as in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome unless the electrophysiological characteristics of the accessory pathway and any possible deleterious effect of Lanoxin MD on these characteristics have been evaluated. If an accessory pathway is known or suspected to be present and there is no history of previous supraventricular arrhythmias, Lanoxin MD is similarly contra-indicated.
- ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.
- hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, unless there is concomitant atrial fibrillation and heart failure, but even then caution should be exercised if Lanoxin MD is to be used.
Patients receiving Lanoxin MD should have their serum electrolytes and renal function (serum creatinine concentration) assessed periodically; the frequency of assessments will depend on the clinical setting.
Serum concentrations of Lanoxin MD may be expressed in Conventional Units of nanograms/ml or in SI units of nanomol/l. To convert nanograms/ml to nanomol/l, multiply nanograms/ml by 1.28.
The serum concentration of Lanoxin MD can be determined by radioimmunoassay.
Blood should be taken 6 hours or more after the last dose of Lanoxin MD.
There are no rigid guidelines as to the range of serum concentrations that are most efficacious. Several post hoc analyses of heart failure patients in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial suggest that the optimal trough Lanoxin MD serum level may be 0.5 nanograms/ml (0.64 nanomol/l) to 1.0 nanograms/ml (1.28 nanomol/l).
Lanoxin MD toxicity is more commonly associated with serum Lanoxin MD concentration greater than 2 nanograms/ml. However, serum Lanoxin MD concentration should be interpreted in the clinical context. Toxicity may occur with lower Lanoxin MD serum concentrations. In deciding whether a patient's symptoms are due to Lanoxin MD, the clinical state together with the serum potassium level and thyroid function are important factors.
Determination of the serum Lanoxin MD concentration may be very helpful in making a decision to treat with further Lanoxin MD, but other glycosides and endogenous Lanoxin MD-like substances, including metabolites of Lanoxin MD, can interfere with the assays that are available and one should always be wary of values which do not seem commensurate with the clinical state of the patient. Observations while temporary withholding of Lanoxin MD might be more appropriate.
Arrhythmias may be precipitated by Lanoxin MD toxicity, some of which can resemble arrhythmias for which the drug could be advised. For example, atrial tachycardia with varying atrioventricular block requires particular care as clinically the rhythm resembles atrial fibrillation.
Many beneficial effects of Lanoxin MD on arrhythmias result from a degree of atrioventricular conduction blockade. However, when incomplete atrioventricular block already exists the effects of a rapid progression in the block should be anticipated. In complete heart block the idioventricular escape rhythm may be suppressed.
In some cases of sinoatrial disorder (i.e. Sick Sinus Syndrome) Lanoxin MD may cause or exacerbate sinus bradycardia or cause sinoatrial block.
The administration of Lanoxin MD in the period immediately following myocardial infarction is not contraindicated. However, the use of inotropic drugs in some patients in this setting may result in undesirable increases in myocardial oxygen demand and ischaemia, and some retrospective follow-up studies have suggested Lanoxin MD to be associated with an increased risk of death. However, the possibility of arrhythmias arising in patients who may be hypokalaemic after myocardial infarction and are likely to be haemodynamically unstable must be borne in mind. The limitations imposed thereafter on direct current cardioversion must also be remembered.
Treatment with Lanoxin MD should generally be avoided in patients with heart failure associated with cardiac amyloidosis. However, if alternative treatments are not appropriate, Lanoxin MD can be used with caution to control the ventricular rate in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation.
Lanoxin MD can rarely precipitate vasoconstriction and therefore should be avoided in patients with myocarditis.
Beri beri heart disease
Patients with beri beri heart disease may fail to respond adequately to Lanoxin MD if the underlying thiamine deficiency is not treated concomitantly. There is also some published information indicating that Lanoxin MD may inhibit the uptake of thiamine in myocytes in beri beri heart disease.
Lanoxin MD should not be used in constrictive pericarditis unless it is used to control the ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation or to improve systolic dysfunction.
Lanoxin MD improves exercise tolerance in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic dysfunction and normal sinus rhythm. This may or may not be associated with an improved haemodynamic profile. However, the benefit of Lanoxin MD in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias is most evident at rest, less evident with exercise.
In patients receiving diuretics and an ACE inhibitor, or diuretics alone, the withdrawal of Lanoxin MD has been shown to result in clinical deterioration.
The use of therapeutic doses of Lanoxin MD may cause prolongation of the PR interval and depression of the ST segment on the electrocardiogram.
Lanoxin MD may produce false positive ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram during exercise testing. These electrophysiologic effects reflect an expected effect of the drug and are not indicative of toxicity.
Severe respiratory disease
Patients with severe respiratory disease may have an increased myocardial sensitivity to digitalis glycosides.
Hypokalaemia sensitises the myocardium to the actions of cardiac glycosides.
Hypoxia, hypomagnesaemia and hypercalcaemia
Hypoxia, Hypomagnesaemia and marked hypercalcaemia increase myocardial sensitivity to cardiac glycosides.
Administering Lanoxin MD to a patient with thyroid disease requires care. Initial and maintenance doses of Lanoxin MD should be reduced when thyroid function is subnormal. In hyperthyroidism there is relative Lanoxin MD resistance and the dose may have to be increased. During the course of treatment of thyrotoxicosis, dosage should be reduced as the thyrotoxicosis comes under control.
Patients with malabsorption syndrome or gastro-intestinal reconstructions may require larger doses of Lanoxin MD.
Chronic congestive cardiac failure
Although many patients with chronic congestive cardiac failure benefit from acute administration of Lanoxin MD, there are some in whom it does not lead to constant, marked or lasting haemodynamic improvement. It is therefore important to evaluate the response of each patient individually when Lanoxin MD is continued long-term.
Direct current cardioversion
The risk of provoking dangerous arrhythmias with direct current cardioversion is greatly increased in the presence of digitalis toxicity and is in proportion to the cardioversion energy used.
For elective direct current cardioversion of a patient who is taking Lanoxin MD, the drug should be withheld for 24 hours before cardioversion is performed. In emergencies, such as cardiac arrest, when attempting cardioversion the lowest effective energy should be applied.
Direct current cardioversion is inappropriate in the treatment of arrhythmias thought to be caused by cardiac glycosides.
Since central nervous system and visual disturbances have been reported in patients receiving Lanoxin MD, patients should exercise caution before driving, using machinery or participating in dangerous activities.
In general, the adverse reactions of Lanoxin MD are dose-dependent and occur at doses higher than those needed to achieve a therapeutic effect.
Hence, adverse reactions are less common when Lanoxin MD is used within the recommended dose range or therapeutic serum concentration range and when there is careful attention to concurrent medications and conditions.
Tabulated list of adverse reactions
Adverse reactions are listed below by system organ class and frequency. Frequencies are defined as:
very common (> 1/10),
common (> 1/100 and < 1/10),
uncommon (> 1/1,000 and < 1/100),
rare (> 1/10,000 and < 1/1,000),
very rare (< 1/10,000), including isolated reports.
Very common, common and uncommon events were generally determined from clinical trial data. The incidence in placebo was taken into account. Adverse drug reactions identified through post-marketing surveillance were considered to be rare or very rare (including isolated reports).
System Organ Class
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Psychosis, apathy, confusion
Nervous system disorders
CNS disturbances, dizziness
Visual disturbances (blurred or yellow vision)
Arrhythmia, conduction disturbances, bigeminy, trigeminy, PR prolongation, sinus bradycardia
Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, atrial tachycardia (with or without block), junctional (nodal) tachycardia, ventricular arrhythmia, ventricular premature contraction, ST segment depression
Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea
Intestinal ischaemia, intestinal necrosis
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin rashes of urticarial or scarlatiniform character may be accompanied by pronounced eosinophilia
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Gynaecomastia can occur with long term administration
General disorders and administration site conditions
Fatigue, malaise, weakness
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme Website: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store.
Symptoms and signs
Signs and symptoms of Lanoxin MD toxicity become more frequent with levels above 2.0 nanograms/ml (2.56 nanomol/l) although there is considerable inter-individual variation. However, in deciding whether a patient's symptoms are due to Lanoxin MD, the clinical state, together with serum electrolyte levels and thyroid function are important factors. In patients undergoing haemodialysis, Lanoxin MD use is associated with increased mortality; patients with low predialysis potassium concentrations are most at risk.
In adults without heart disease, clinical observation suggests that an overdose of Lanoxin MD of 10 to 15 mg was the dose resulting in death of half of the patients. If more than 25 mg of Lanoxin MD was ingested by an adult without heart disease, death or progressive toxicity responsive only to Lanoxin MD-binding Fab antibody fragments resulted.
Cardiac manifestations are the most frequent and serious sign of both acute and chronic toxicity. Peak cardiac effects generally occur 3 to 6 hours following over dosage and may persist for the ensuing 24 hours or longer. Lanoxin MD toxicity may result in almost any type of arrhythmia. Multiple rhythm disturbances in the same patient are common. These include paroxysmal atrial tachycardia with variable atrioventricular (AV) block, accelerated junctional rhythm, slow atrial fibrillation (with very little variation in the ventricular rate) and bi directional ventricular tachycardia.
Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are often the earliest and most common arrhythmia. Bigeminy or trigeminy also occur frequently.
Sinus bradycardia and other bradyarrhythmias are very common.
First, second, third degree heart blocks and AV dissociation are also common.
Early toxicity may only be manifested by prolongation of the PR interval.
Ventricular tachycardia may also be a manifestation of toxicity.
Cardiac arrest from asystole or ventricular fibrillation due to Lanoxin MD toxicity is usually fatal.
Acute massive Lanoxin MD overdose can result in mild to pronounced hyperkalaemia due to inhibition of the sodium-potassium (Na+-K+) pump. Hypokalaemia may contribute to toxicity.
Gastrointestinal symptoms are very common in both acute and chronic toxicity. The symptoms precede cardiac manifestations in approximately half of the patients in most literature reports. Anorexia, nausea and vomiting have been reported with an incidence up to 80%. These symptoms usually present early in the course of an overdose.
Neurologic and visual manifestations occur in both acute and chronic toxicity. Dizziness, various CNS disturbances, fatigue and malaise are very common. The most frequent visual disturbance is an aberration of colour vision (predominance of yellow green). These neurological and visual symptoms may persist even after other signs of toxicity have resolved.
In chronic toxicity, non-specific non-cardiac symptoms, such as malaise and weakness, may predominate.
In children aged 1 to 3 years without heart disease, clinical observation suggests that an overdose of Lanoxin MD of 6 to 10 mg was the dose resulting in death in half of the patients.
If more than 10 mg of Lanoxin MD was ingested by a child aged 1 to 3 years without heart disease, the outcome was uniformly fatal when Fab fragment treatment was not given.
Most manifestations of chronic toxicity in children occur during or shortly after Lanoxin MD overdose.
The same arrhythmias or combination of arrhythmias that occur in adults can occur in paediatrics. Sinus tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, and rapid atrial fibrillation are seen less frequently in the paediatric population.
Paediatric patients are more likely to present with an AV conduction disturbance or a sinus bradycardia.
Ventricular ectopy is less common, however in massive overdose, ventricular ectopy, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation have been reported.
In neonates, sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest and/or prolonged PR intervals are frequent signs of toxicity. Sinus bradycardia is common in young infants and children. In older children, AV blocks are the most common conduction disorders.
Any arrhythmia or alteration in cardiac conduction that develops in a child taking Lanoxin MD should be assumed to be caused by Lanoxin MD, until further evaluation proves otherwise.
The frequent non-cardiac manifestations similar to those seen in adults are gastrointestinal, CNS and visual. However, nausea and vomiting are not frequent in infants and small children.
In addition to the undesirable effects seen with recommended doses, weight loss in older age groups and failure to thrive in infants, abdominal pain due to mesenteric artery ischaemia, drowsiness and behavioural disturbances including psychotic manifestations have been reported in overdose.
After recent ingestion, such as accidental or deliberate self-poisoning, the load available for absorption may be reduced by gastric lavage.
Gastric lavage increases vagal tone and may precipitate or worsen arrhythmias. Consider pretreatment with atropine if gastric lavage is performed. Treatment with digitalis Fab antibody usually renders gastric lavage unnecessary. In the rare instances in which gastric lavage is indicated, it should only be performed by individuals with proper training and expertise.
Patients with massive digitalis ingestion should receive large doses of activated charcoal to prevent absorption and bind Lanoxin MD in the gut during enteroenteric recirculation.
If hypokalaemia is present, it should be corrected with potassium supplements either orally or intravenously, depending on the urgency of the situation. In cases where a large amount of Lanoxin MD has been ingested, hyperkalaemia may be present due to release of potassium from skeletal muscle. Before administering potassium in Lanoxin MD overdose the serum potassium level must be known.
Bradyarrhythmias may respond to atropine but temporary cardiac pacing may be required. Ventricular arrhythmias may respond to lignocaine or phenytoin.
Dialysis is not particularly effective in removing Lanoxin MD from the body in potentially life-threatening toxicity.
Lanoxin MD-specific antibody Fab is a specific treatment for Lanoxin MD toxicity and is very effective. Rapid reversal of the complications that are associated with serious poisoning by Lanoxin MD, digitoxin and related glycosides has followed intravenous administration of Lanoxin MD-specific (ovine) antibody fragments (Fab) when other therapies have failed.
For details, consult the literature supplied with antibody fragments.
Cardiac therapy, cardiac glycosides, digitalis glycosides.
ATC code: C01AA05
Mechanism of action
Lanoxin MD increases contractility of the myocardium by direct activity. This effect is proportional to dose in the lower range and some effect is achieved with quite low dosing; it occurs even in normal myocardium although it is then entirely without physiological benefit. The primary action of Lanoxin MD is specifically to inhibit adenosine triphosphatase, and thus sodium-potassium (Na+-K+) exchange activity, the altered ionic distribution across the membrane resulting in an augmented calcium ion influx and thus an increase in the availability of calcium at the time of excitation-contraction coupling. The potency of Lanoxin MD may therefore appear considerably enhanced when the extracellular potassium concentration is low, with hyperkalaemia having the opposite effect.
Lanoxin MD exerts the same fundamental effect of inhibition of the Na+-K+ exchange mechanism on cells of the autonomic nervous system, stimulating them to exert indirect cardiac activity. Increases in efferent vagal impulses result in reduced sympathetic tone and diminished impulse conduction rate through the atria and atrio-ventricular node. Thus, the major beneficial effect of Lanoxin MD is reduction of ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration of a loading dose produces an appreciable pharmacological effect within 5 to 30 mins, while using the oral route the onset of effect occurs in 0.5 to 2 hours.
The PROVED trial designed to determine the effectiveness of Lanoxin MD in 88 patients with chronic, stable mild to moderate heart failure. Withdrawal of Lanoxin MD or its continuation was performed in a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial of patients with chronic, stable mild to moderate heart failure secondary to left ventricular systolic dysfunction who had normal sinus rhythm and were receiving long-term treatment with diuretic drugs and Lanoxin MD. Patients withdrawn from Lanoxin MD therapy showed worsened maximal exercise capacity (p = 0.003) an increased incidence of treatment failures (p = 0.039) and a decreased time to treatment failure (p = 0.037). Patients who continued to receive Lanoxin MD had a lower body weight (p = 0.044) and heart rate (p = 0.003) and a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.016). The overall percentage of participants having one or more adverse event was similar in the two groups: 59 % in the placebo group and 69 % in the Lanoxin MD group. The types of adverse event were unspecified.
The RADIANCE trial examined the effects of discontinuation of Lanoxin MD in stable NYHA class II and III patients who were receiving diuretics and ACE inhibitors. The 178 patients were initially stabilised on a combination of captopril or enalapril, diuretics and Lanoxin MD, then randomised to continue Lanoxin MD therapy or change to placebo. The relative risk of worsening disease in the placebo group was 5.9 compared to the Lanoxin MD group. Withdrawal of Lanoxin MD was accompanied by worsening symptoms, reduced exercise tolerance, and a deteriorating quality of life, indicating that patients with CHF were at considerable risk from discontinuation of the drug in spite of the continuation of therapy with diuretics and ACE inhibitors. Approximately 56 % in the placebo group and 49% in the Lanoxin MD group experienced unspecified side effects.
In the DIG trial, 6800 patients with heart failure were randomised to receive Lanoxin MD or placebo. No difference was found in all-cause mortality between patients who were treated with Lanoxin MD and those who were given placebo. In the Lanoxin MD group, there was a trend toward a decrease in the risk of death attributed to worsening heart failure (risk ratio,0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.01; p = 0.06). However, the patients who received Lanoxin MD had significantly (p<0.001) fewer hospital admissions when the drug was given in addition to diuretics and ACE inhibitors. Lanoxin MD therapy was most beneficial in patients with ejection fractions of â‰¤ 25%, patients with enlarged hearts (cardiothoracic ratio of >0.55), and patients in NYHA functional class III or IV. In the DIG study, 11.9 % of patients in the Lanoxin MD arm and 7.9 % of patients in the placebo arm were suspected of having Lanoxin MD toxicity, the most common symptoms being new episodes of ventricular fibrillation, supraventricular arrhythmia, tachycardia, or advanced atrioventricular block.
The AFFIRM study involved a total of 4060 patients recruited to a randomised, multicentre comparison of two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death. The primary end point was overall mortality. There were 356 deaths among the patients assigned to rhythm-control therapy (amiodarone, disopyramide, flecainide, moricizine, procainamide, propafenone, quinidine, sotalol, and combinations of these drugs) and 310 deaths among those assigned to rate-control [_Î² -blockers, calcium-channel blockers (verapamil and diltiazem), Lanoxin MD, and combinations of these drugs) therapy (mortality at five years, 23.8% and 21.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.34]; p=0.08). More patients in the rhythm-control group than in the rate control group were hospitalised, and there were more adverse drug effects in the rhythm-control group as well.
Indirect cardiac contractility changes also result from changes in venous compliance brought about by the altered autonomic activity and by direct venous stimulation. The interplay between direct and indirect activity governs the total circulatory response, which is not identical for all subjects. In the presence of certain supraventricular arrhythmias, the neurogenically mediated slowing of AV conduction is paramount.
The degree of neurohormonal activation occurring in patients with heart failure is associated with clinical deterioration and an increased risk of death. Lanoxin MD reduces activation of both the sympathetic nervous system and the (renin-angiotensin) system independently of its inotropic actions, and may thus favorably influence survival. Whether this is achieved via direct sympathoinhibitory effects or by re-sensitising baroreflex mechanisms remains unclear.
The Tmax following IV administration is approximately 1 to 5 hours, while the Tmax for oral administration is 2 to 6 hours. Upon oral administration, Lanoxin MD is absorbed from the stomach and upper part of the small intestine. When Lanoxin MD is taken after meals, the rate of absorption is slowed, but the total amount of Lanoxin MD absorbed is usually unchanged. When taken with meals high in fibre, however, the amount absorbed from an oral dose may be reduced.
The bioavailability of orally administered Lanoxin MD is approximately 63 % in tablet form and 75 % as oral solution.
The initial distribution of Lanoxin MD from the central to the peripheral compartment generally lasts from 6 to 8 hours. This is followed by a more gradual decline in serum Lanoxin MD concentration, which is dependent upon Lanoxin MD elimination from the body. The volume of distribution is large (Vdss = 510 litres in healthy volunteers), indicating Lanoxin MD to be extensively bound to body tissues. The highest Lanoxin MD concentrations are seen in the heart, liver and kidney that in the heart averaging 30- fold that in the systemic circulation. Although the concentration in skeletal muscle is far lower, this store cannot be overlooked since skeletal muscle represents 40% of total body weight. Of the small proportion of Lanoxin MD circulating in plasma, approximately 25% is bound to protein.
The majority of Lanoxin MD is excreted by the kidneys as an intact drug, although a small fraction of the dose is metabolised to pharmacologically active and inactive metabolites. The main metabolites of Lanoxin MD are dihydroLanoxin MD and digoxygenin.
The major route of elimination is renal excretion of the unchanged drug.
Lanoxin MD is a substrate for P-glycoprotein. As an efflux protein on the apical membrane of enterocytes, P-glycoprotein may limit the absorption of Lanoxin MD. P-glycoprotein in renal proximal tubules appears to be an important factor in the renal elimination of Lanoxin MD.
Following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers, between 60 and 75% of a Lanoxin MD dose is recovered unchanged in the urine over a 6 day follow-up period. Total body clearance of Lanoxin MD has been shown to be directly related to renal function, and percent daily loss is thus a function of creatinine clearance, which in turn may be estimated from a stable serum creatinine. The total and renal clearances of Lanoxin MD have been found to be 193 Â± 25 ml/min and 152 Â± 24 ml/min in a healthy control population.
In a small percentage of individuals, orally administered Lanoxin MD is converted to cardioinactive reduction products (Lanoxin MD reduction products or DRPs) by colonic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. In these subjects over 40% of the dose may be excreted as DRPs in the urine. Renal clearances of the two main metabolites, dihydroLanoxin MD and digoxygenin, have been found to be 79 Â± 13 ml/min and 100 Â± 26 ml/min respectively.
In the majority of cases however, the major route of Lanoxin MD elimination is renal excretion of the unchanged drug.
The terminal elimination half-life of Lanoxin MD in patients with normal renal function is 30 to 40 h.
Since most of the drug is bound to the tissues rather than circulating in the blood, Lanoxin MD is not effectively removed from the body during cardiopulmonary by-pass. Furthermore, only about 3% of a Lanoxin MD dose is removed from the body during five hours of haemodialysis.
In the newborn period, renal clearance of Lanoxin MD is diminished and suitable dosage adjustments must be observed. This is especially pronounced in the premature infant since renal clearance reflects maturation of renal function. Lanoxin MD clearance has been found to be 65.6 Â± 30 ml/min/1.73m2 at 3 months, compared to only 32 Â± 7 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 1 week. By 12 months Lanoxin MD clearance of 88 Â± 43 ml / min / 1.73m2 has been reported. Beyond the immediate newborn period, children generally require proportionally larger doses than adults on the basis of body weight and body surface area.
The terminal elimination half-life of Lanoxin MD is prolonged in patients with impaired renal function, and in anuric patients will be of the order of 100 hours.
Hepatic impairment has little effect on Lanoxin MD clearance.
Age-related declines in renal function in elderly patients can result in a lower rates of Lanoxin MD clearance than in younger subjects, with reported Lanoxin MD clearance rates in the elderly of 53 ml/min/1.73m2.
Lanoxin MD clearance is 12% - 14% less in females than males and may need to be considered in dosing calculations.
Lanoxin MD showed no genotoxic potential in in vitro studies (Ames test and mouse lymphoma). No data are available on the carcinogenic potential of Lanoxin MD.
If only part used, discard the remaining solution.
Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements
However, we will provide data for each active ingredient